06 February, 2011
CiF comment of the day
From today's CiF shouting match about CallMeDave's anti-multiculti speech:
Yes, er, right.
"When I said that the plaintiff might meet with an accident, Your Honour, I was of course speaking in the abstract. I was merely stating the unarguable fact that there is necessarily a non-zero probability that the plaintiff might suffer an accident at some stage in the future. It is outrageous to infer that a threat was intended. Innit?"
The sad thing is that "Davgrin" is almost certainly being entirely serious.
Davgrin
6 February 2011 3:00AMandrewwiseman
6 February 2011 2:53AM
Davgrin
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2006/07/05/1678954.htm
I in 10 muslims supported the 7/7 killings of innocent britons by muslim fanatics, uk muslims are the enemy within
I'm sorry, I've followed your link and I don't see what you apparently see. The fact that one in ten Muslims see the 7/7 bombers as martyrs doesn't necessarily impute any agreement with the bombers' actions. The Muslims are just stating that the bombers died carrying out a religious act, not that they agree with that act.
Yes, er, right.
"When I said that the plaintiff might meet with an accident, Your Honour, I was of course speaking in the abstract. I was merely stating the unarguable fact that there is necessarily a non-zero probability that the plaintiff might suffer an accident at some stage in the future. It is outrageous to infer that a threat was intended. Innit?"
The sad thing is that "Davgrin" is almost certainly being entirely serious.
# posted by Edwin Greenwood @ 22:19 
